Japan's economic retaliation is unlikely to resolve Korea-Japan conflict. Our government is also in a tough position, but Japan is not in a position to back off, and there is no smooth dialogue between Korea and Japan. Although the United States will play a role, it is uncertain how aggressively it will resolve conflicts.

At this stage, it seems inevitable that the Korean government strongly responds to the negotiation strategy. Because Japan is taking action in economic retaliation and there is a possibility of further action, it would not be possible for negotiations to be held properly if the negotiations are suspended. However, considering the damage of our economy, it will not be a dispute that it is wise for us to finally solve the problem through dialogue and negotiation.
What kind of approach should Japan take when negotiating for the compensation of victims? Everything is okay with us, but diplomacy is the opposite, so we have to find a way to accept each other. This problem is not something to be solved especially by approaching emotionally.

On the 18th, the Seoul Press Center hosted a forum to discuss how to respond to "Japan's economic retaliation" under the auspices of domestic experts from Japan sponsored by the Korea Press Foundation. A brief introduction by the Japanese experts is presented.

● Significance "Arrangement of arbitration ... Let's accept ... how to earn time"
The former colonial minister and director of the Cold War Study Society from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan, said, "Let's accept the proposals of the arbitration committee required by Japan." It takes a long time to form an arbitration committee.

In order to form an arbitration committee, a committee should come from a third country. It will take a long time to select committee members to select committee members to be agreed by the two countries. If the arbitrator is selected, this person should read the related materials. Since the issue is a problem between Korea and Japan, all the materials in Korean and Japanese should be translated into English. It will take a lot of time to translate.

Yoo insists that if you make time through the composition of the arbitration committee, you can research more about how to solve the problem by using such time, and you can calmly deal with the problem. In Japan, there is a resentment that the Korean government ignored Japan's request for consultation after the Supreme Court ruling, and there are some aspects that can show us that we are working through the formation of the arbitration committee.

● Lee Won-deok "I have to think about judging the International Court of Justice"
Lee Won-deok Professor of International Studies at Kookmin University offers a more aggressive plan. Professor Lee says that as a solution to compensation for disability compensation, the Korean government and the Korean government may present a funding option as a first option but consider the second option to bring the issue to the International Court of Justice.

The current conflict between Korea and Japan is "logically understood to be caused by inconsistencies between our Supreme Court decision and Japan's Supreme Court judgment." "If we do not do warfare, the only way to solve it peacefully is to ask a third party a solution" "Professor Lee says.

The International Court of Justice filed a complaint stating, "Putting the Korean-Japanese confrontation on the shelf in a state of truce." "It takes four years for the final judgment to take time, It will be done. " As for the sentiment that feels rejected by the International Court of Justice, Professor Lee said, "You can file a complaint only on the issue of the victim's relief," he said. "Because of the methodology of how to do the victim's relief, There is no big deal to do. "

● Nam Ki-jung "Our government will compensate with a separate track"

Nam Ki-jung, associate professor at the Institute of Japanese Studies at Seoul National University, suggests that the Korean government and the Japanese corporation repay the victims to a separate track, which is separate from the 1 + 1 ophthalmology fund.

If the roots of the Republic of Korea are regarded as a provisional government, the provisional government having the obligation to protect the lives and property of the people shall be responsible for failing to fulfill its obligations, so that the government of the Republic of Korea, succeeding the provisional government, It will be part of the responsibility to compensate for the damage. Professor Nam said that this is the most obvious way to confirm our position from the provisional government to the Republic of Korea. After explaining these new efforts, it is necessary to dispatch a special envoy to induce the Japanese government to comply with Japanese settlement I argue.

● In reality, we have to yield to each other little by little
Now that the situation is complicated, Japanese experts have different thoughts and can not say which opinion is right. In addition, it is now necessary for us to confront the unjust actions of Japan.

However, what is important is that dialogue efforts must be sought on the part of the Korean and Japanese counterparts, and realistic countermeasures that yield little by little in the dialogue are bound to be discussed. I would also like to refer to the opinions of Japanese experts in this forum to discuss practical measures.